Back to CEU courses

Why Visual Performance Matters: Foundations for Occupational Therapy Practice: facilitator notes

Presenter cues, worked examples, and answer keys for the case slides and discussion prompts · Module 3.

Presenter-side material. Not part of the learner module body and not counted toward contact hours. Model answers are teaching examples. Adapt to your state practice act, payer rules, and district policy.

Module 3

Underlying Conditions vs. Functional Limitations

~30 min · 18 slides

Presenter cues

  • Say the frame before the condition list: these are the mechanisms other people diagnose, and knowing them tells you what ceiling you are working under.
  • The red-flag slide is the safety slide of this course. Slow down and read it.
  • End on the standing rule: diagnosed and managed = address it; undiagnosed, unclear, or changing = refer it, and keep working either way.

Answer key

Which underlying conditions could plausibly produce this picture, and which of them would a passed acuity screen fail to detect?
Plausible: intermittent strabismus or a decompensating phoria (head tilt, intermittent diplopia), convergence or accommodative insufficiency, an uncorrected refractive error including astigmatism, photophobia from an anterior-segment or albinism-spectrum condition, or a superior oblique palsy driving the tilt. A distance acuity screening detects none of them: it does not test binocular alignment, fusion, near function, accommodation, contrast sensitivity, or light sensitivity. Also flag urgency — new or worsening diplopia, or a new head tilt, is a prompt-referral item, not a wait-and-watch item.
Write the one sentence of documentation that names the functional limitation you will treat, without naming a diagnosis.
Model: "During sustained near reading, [student] maintains a right head tilt, reports intermittent blur and doubling after approximately five minutes, and loses place on 6 of 10 lines; near-work endurance and place-keeping are the OT targets while a comprehensive eye examination is pending." No condition is named, urgency is implied, and the OT target is explicit.

Examples to read aloud

  • Reflection model answer (Module 3): "During a 15-minute writing task, Marcus closed his left eye for most of the session and moved to 12 cm from the page; this matters because he completes half the written work of his peers in the same time."
  • Mini-exercise model answer: three commonly missed on a school screen — (1) convergence insufficiency, because the screen tests distance, not near; (2) CVI, because acuity can be normal while visual processing is not; (3) contrast-sensitivity loss, because high-contrast charts do not test it.

Watch-outs

  • Participants will want to "rule out" CVI. OT observation cannot rule any condition in or out. Describe the behaviors and route it.
  • Someone will ask whether ONH means the child is autistic. It does not. Autistic-like behaviors — light gazing, stereotypies, atypical social gaze — are frequently reported in ONH, and they are described functionally, never diagnosed by OT.