Back to CEU courses

Why Visual Performance Matters: Foundations for Occupational Therapy Practice: facilitator notes

Presenter cues, worked examples, and answer keys for the case slides and discussion prompts · Module 4.

Presenter-side material. Not part of the learner module body and not counted toward contact hours. Model answers are teaching examples. Adapt to your state practice act, payer rules, and district policy.

Module 4

Comorbidity Patterns

~25 min · 15 slides

Presenter cues

  • Say "association is not causation" out loud at least three times in this module. It is the legal and ethical spine of the content.
  • Give participants the exact phrase for a team meeting: "I am not saying vision causes this. I am saying there is an unanswered visual question, and here is the observation behind it."

Answer key

Which findings are visual-performance signs worth documenting separately from the ADHD diagnosis?
Two: (1) place loss — three times in one paragraph, which is a countable, condition-bound observation; (2) figure-ground search failure — cannot locate a pencil in a cluttered field, which you can test again with a decluttered field. Both are documented as performance under a stated condition, separate from the ADHD diagnosis and without claiming vision explains the ADHD. Handwriting quality itself is a visual-motor output observation and belongs in the OT plan regardless.
What would your present-level sentence say, and what referral (if any) would accompany it?
Model: "During 10-minute paragraph copy, [student] loses place 3 times and requires 2 adult prompts to resume; he locates a target item in a cluttered field on 1 of 5 trials and 5 of 5 trials when the field is reduced to three items. Reduced-clutter materials and a line guide are in place. Referral: comprehensive eye examination if none is on file within the past year." Referral is warranted here because near-work place loss has not been evaluated — not because ADHD requires one.

Examples to read aloud

  • Reflection model answer (Module 4): "I will ask: when he does sustained written work, what visual demand is hardest to meet — finding the target, holding the place, or holding the endurance?"
  • Mini-exercise model answer: "Reading decoding difficulty is being addressed as a language-based skill by the reading specialist. Separately, OT observes near-work place loss and reduced copy endurance under 10-minute conditions. These are documented as distinct concerns; a comprehensive eye examination has been recommended to answer the visual-efficiency question. OT does not attribute the reading difficulty to vision."

Watch-outs

  • A participant will bring up colored overlays for dyslexia. Answer: dyslexia is language-based; overlays are not a treatment for it. If a student prefers a tint, trial it as a comfort/contrast variable with a measured outcome, and keep reading intervention where it belongs.
  • Someone will say vision therapy fixes dyslexia. That is contradicted by the AAP/AAO/AACO joint statement. Do not let it stand unaddressed in a live room.