Back to CEU courses

Vision in OT Practice: facilitator notes

Presenter cues, worked examples, and answer keys for the case slides and discussion prompts · Module 5.

Presenter-side material. Not part of the learner module body and not counted toward contact hours. Model answers are teaching examples. Adapt to your state practice act, payer rules, and district policy.

Module 5

Reading the Profile — Four Patterns

~25 min · 10 slides

Presenter cues

  • Run each pattern as a live poll: treat, accommodate, refer, or monitor — then reveal the reasoning.
  • Repeat the four-step sorting rule after every case so it becomes automatic.

Answer key

Bottom-heavy: what does the degradation curve tell you that a single accuracy score cannot?
It separates capacity from endurance. The student can do the task; they cannot sustain it. A single early-session score would have been recorded as a pass and the referral question would have gone unanswered. The curve also gives you your progress measure — the minute at which accuracy drops.
Bottom-heavy: what is the first disposition decision — treat, refer, or both?
Both, in parallel. Refer to eye care if any symptom or acuity/contrast finding is present, and simultaneously begin OT work on the Level 2 floor plus an immediate access change the teacher can keep (chunked work periods, reduced copy volume, line guide).
Top-heavy: which level do you target first, and why not start at the top?
Target Level 4 (visual-motor integration). Starting at Level 5 with more writing practice loads the failing system without changing it — you get volume, fatigue, and no transfer. Stabilize the graded motor output, then re-embed it in the writing occupation.
Top-heavy: how do you grade the writing task to isolate the visual-motor contribution?
Hold the linguistic demand constant (copying, not composing), then vary only one visual-motor parameter at a time: line width and spacing, print size, model proximity (adjacent vs. far model), and speed. If legibility recovers with an adjacent model and wider ruling, the constraint is visual-motor, not language.
Flat low: what validity threats must you rule out before interpreting?
The five: setup drift (distance, lighting, positioning), state (illness, hunger, medication timing, time of day), attention/effort inconsistency across comparable items, language or instruction comprehension, and missing or outdated habitual correction. A flat low profile is a validity question until proven otherwise.
Flat low: what is your referral obligation before writing an OT plan?
Confirm a current eye examination with habitual correction verified. If there is none, or if any red-flag symptom is present, refer now and document that interpretation is deferred pending that information. You may still write access accommodations in the meantime.
Spiky: what must you confirm before writing a goal on an isolated skill?
Replicate it. Re-probe the same skill on a different day with a parallel item set and confirm the pattern holds; a single spike can be an attention or item-familiarity artifact. Also confirm that the skill actually constrains an occupation in this student’s day.
Spiky: how do you tie a Level 3 finding to an occupational outcome?
Name the classroom task that carries that demand: figure-ground shows up as locating a problem on a dense worksheet, a word in a glossary, or a locker in a crowded hallway; spatial relations shows up in graph paper math alignment, diagram reading, and map work. Write the goal at that task, not at the perceptual skill.