4.1 — IEPs, Medicaid, and Occupation-Based Documentation
TransitionSay this
Transition: "IEPs, Medicaid, and Occupation-Based Documentation."
My notes
Presenter study handout
3 contact hours · 0.3 AOTA CEUs · Module 4 · 17 slides
Presenter-side material. Each block shows the slide as the audience sees it, the talk track, and space for your own notes. Model answers appear here — do not hand this version to learners.
Say this
Transition: "IEPs, Medicaid, and Occupation-Based Documentation."
My notes
Say this
Open here. "IEPs, Medicaid, and Functional Documentation." Turning visual performance findings into defensible educational relevance.
Say why this section matters for their caseload, then advance.
My notes
Say this
Ask the poll: "What most often gets your vision-related goals pushed back?"
Options:
• Educational relevance is questioned
My notes
Say this
Frame the slide: "What a reviewer needs to see."
Walk each point, one sentence each:
• The occupation: what the student is expected to do in the school day.
My notes
Say this
Frame the slide: "Occupation-based goals, not skill-drill goals."
Walk each point, one sentence each:
• Target the occupation: copying, sustained reading, worksheet completion, note-taking.
My notes
Say this
Read the scenario aloud, slowly:
Grade 3 student: near copying accuracy 92% for the first 3 minutes, dropping to 58% by minute 9, with 7 place-loss events. Acuity screen passed.
Then put these questions to the room:
My notes
Say this
Contrast the two columns: Reviewer accepts versus Reviewer questions.
Reviewer accepts:
• Copy accuracy falls 34% within one class period
My notes
Say this
Frame the slide: "What has to be in the note."
Walk each point, one sentence each:
• Skilled reasoning: why an OT was required for this session.
My notes
Say this
Frame the slide: "Write accommodations from measured conditions."
Walk each point, one sentence each:
• Only list a modification you tested and recorded a change from.
My notes
Say this
Set up the clip in one sentence, play it, then debrief with "what did you notice?"
My notes
Say this
Describe what belongs here: De-identified IEP text showing the present level and matching annual goal..
My notes
Say this
Describe what belongs here: Baseline vs. re-probe data used to document progress..
My notes
Say this
Land the "so what": If the present level does not name the occupation, the condition, and the measurable demand, the service does not get funded and the goal does not get taught.
Explain the mechanism plainly: IEP teams and Medicaid reviewers cannot act on "poor visual skills." They act on observable performance under stated conditions.
Then give them the moves — say each one as something they can do Monday:
My notes
Say this
Set up the contrast: "Before / after: the same student, two present levels."
Point at the before panel first. Reads as a diagnosis, cannot be measured, names no occupation.
Then the after panel. Observation, condition, and measurable classroom demand.
My notes
Say this
Two-minute case. Read it aloud:
A draft IEP present level reads: "Student demonstrates poor visual tracking and visual perceptual weakness affecting academics."
Put the question to them: "Rewrite it in one sentence you could defend in a Medicaid audit." Give 60 seconds, no talking.
My notes
Say this
Reflection prompt: "Draft one goal now: name the occupation, the visual performance factor limiting it, the condition, and the criterion."
Cues:
• All four elements, one sentence.
My notes
Say this
Knowledge check: "Which element is missing? "Student will improve visual tracking to 80% accuracy.""
Options:
• The criterion
My notes