Back to CEU courses

Presenter study handout

Vision in OT Practice

3 contact hours · 0.3 AOTA CEUs · Module 5 · 17 slides

Presenter-side material. Each block shows the slide as the audience sees it, the talk track, and space for your own notes. Model answers appear here — do not hand this version to learners.

Module 5

5.1 — Case Walkthroughs: Three Common Occupational Performance Patterns

Transition

Module 5

Case Walkthroughs: Three Common Occupational Performance Patterns

1:44 – 2:14

Vision in OT Practice
1 / 17

Say this

Transition: "Case Walkthroughs: Three Common Occupational Performance Patterns."

My notes

5.2 — Case Walkthroughs

Title

Module 5

Case Walkthroughs

Four real student profiles, worked through together — then one on your own.

Vision in OT Practice
2 / 17

Say this

Open here. "Case Walkthroughs." Four real student profiles, worked through together — then one on your own.

Say why this section matters for their caseload, then advance.

My notes

5.3 — Pattern recognition

Poll

Poll

Pattern recognition

Which of these three presentations shows up most on your caseload?

Vision in OT Practice
3 / 17

Say this

Ask the poll: "Which of these three presentations shows up most on your caseload?"

Options:

• Board copying breaks down, near work is fine

My notes

5.4 — Maya, 3rd grade — "she starts fine, then falls apart"

Case

Case 1 · guided

Maya, 3rd grade — "she starts fine, then falls apart"

Maya, age 8, has glasses worn consistently and a current eye exam. She copies the first two lines from her worksheet accurately, then loses her place, skips lines, and stops after 5 minutes. Her teacher says the first problems on a math page are always her best work.

  • Q1.What does the drop-off after 5 minutes tell you that a single accuracy score does not?
    Guided answer: Accuracy is intact, so the skill exists — what fails is holding it over time. That points to efficiency and endurance (Levels 2–3), not to a missing skill.
  • Q2.Do you treat, refer, or both?
    Guided answer: Treat. Her eye exam is current and her correction is worn, so there is no undiagnosed finding to route out. Build endurance with timed near tasks and reduce the visual load on the page.
VPA™ · Case profile
L1Acuity & sensory foundationincl. field & scanning
strong
L2Visual efficiency
strong
L3Visual processing
limiting
L4Visual-motor integration
emerging
L5Functional integration
breaking down
The same instrument on a different student. Efficiency is intact and processing is the notch — so the plan targets discrimination and figure-ground within real page layouts, not oculomotor drills.
Vision in OT Practice
4 / 17

Say this

Read the scenario aloud, slowly:

Maya, age 8, has glasses worn consistently and a current eye exam. She copies the first two lines from her worksheet accurately, then loses her place, skips lines, and stops after 5 minutes. Her teacher says the first problems on a math page are always her best work.

Then put these questions to the room:

My notes

5.5 — Elijah, 2nd grade — messy writing, clean eyes

Case

Case 2 · guided

Elijah, 2nd grade — messy writing, clean eyes

Elijah, age 7, tracks smoothly, keeps his place while reading, and has 20/20 corrected acuity. His letters vary in size, drift above and below the line, and spacing collapses when he copies from the board.

  • Q1.Which level do you target first?
    Guided answer: Start at the lowest level that is unstable — here that is visual-motor integration (Level 4). Do not start at handwriting output itself; that is the symptom, not the floor.
  • Q2.How do you tell whether it is the visual part or the motor part?
    Guided answer: Grade the task: have him copy from a paper model at his desk instead of the board. If near copying is clean and far copying is not, the breakdown is in the shifting and spatial demand, not in hand control.
Vision in OT Practice
5 / 17

Say this

Read the scenario aloud, slowly:

Elijah, age 7, tracks smoothly, keeps his place while reading, and has 20/20 corrected acuity. His letters vary in size, drift above and below the line, and spacing collapses when he copies from the board.

Then put these questions to the room:

My notes

5.6 — Aiden, 5th grade — low everywhere

Case

Case 3 · guided

Aiden, 5th grade — low everywhere

Aiden, age 10, scores low on every task you present. He was up late, has no eye exam on file, and his teacher reports he "gives up on everything," not just visual work.

  • Q1.What do you check before you interpret any of these scores?
    Guided answer: Rule out validity threats first: sleep and state, effort, task setup and lighting, and whether he even has correction. Flat-low profiles are usually a testing condition problem before they are a vision problem.
  • Q2.What is your obligation about the missing eye exam?
    Guided answer: Refer. There is no diagnosed acuity or contrast finding here — it is undiagnosed. Route to eye care first; you do not build vision-specific goals on an unexamined visual system.
VPA™ · Scored profile
L1Acuity & sensory foundationincl. field & scanning
strong
L2Visual efficiency
limiting
L3Visual processing
emerging
L4Visual-motor integration
limiting
L5Functional integration
breaking down
Profile shape: foundation intact / output limitedIntervention enters at Level 2 (efficiency), not at Level 4 handwriting drill.
Rows are the five framework levels in order (L1 → L5) — the L number is the level, never the score. Performance is the bar and the word beside it. Read the shape before any composite: a flat-but-low profile, a single notch, and a “foundation intact / output collapsed” staircase call for three different plans.
Vision in OT Practice
6 / 17

Say this

Read the scenario aloud, slowly:

Aiden, age 10, scores low on every task you present. He was up late, has no eye exam on file, and his teacher reports he "gives up on everything," not just visual work.

Then put these questions to the room:

My notes

5.7 — Sofia, 8th grade — one spike, everything else fine

Case

Case 4 · guided

Sofia, 8th grade — one spike, everything else fine

Sofia, age 14, reads at grade rate with clean acuity and efficiency. She cannot find a labeled part on a diagram, loses items in a full locker, and misreads graphs in science.

  • Q1.Before you write a goal on figure-ground, what must you confirm?
    Guided answer: Confirm it shows up in real tasks, not just in your testing — locker, diagram, graph. One low score alone is not a goal.
  • Q2.How do you tie this to something the IEP team cares about?
    Guided answer: Write the goal at the occupation: locating labeled information on a science diagram or textbook page within a set time, with the figure-ground skill as the "why," not the goal itself.
Vision in OT Practice
7 / 17

Say this

Read the scenario aloud, slowly:

Sofia, age 14, reads at grade rate with clean acuity and efficiency. She cannot find a labeled part on a diagram, loses items in a full locker, and misreads graphs in science.

Then put these questions to the room:

My notes

5.8 — Noah, kindergarten — your turn, no answers given

Case

Case 5 · your turn

Noah, kindergarten — your turn, no answers given

Noah, age 5, holds books about 4 inches from his face, squints at the whiteboard, and has a documented diagnosis of albinism with reduced acuity managed by his ophthalmologist. He engages well and works hard for 15 minutes at a time.

  • Q1.Is this a referral or something you address? Say why in one sentence.
  • Q2.Name the first two supports you would put in place tomorrow.
VPA™ · Case profile
L1Acuity & sensory foundationincl. field & scanning
strong
L2Visual efficiency
strong
L3Visual processing
limiting
L4Visual-motor integration
emerging
L5Functional integration
breaking down
The same instrument on a different student. Efficiency is intact and processing is the notch — so the plan targets discrimination and figure-ground within real page layouts, not oculomotor drills.
Vision in OT Practice
8 / 17

Say this

Read the scenario aloud, slowly:

Noah, age 5, holds books about 4 inches from his face, squints at the whiteboard, and has a documented diagnosis of albinism with reduced acuity managed by his ophthalmologist. He engages well and works hard for 15 minutes at a time.

Then put these questions to the room:

My notes

5.9 — How to read any profile in four steps

Teaching slide

Sorting rule

How to read any profile in four steps

  • Rule out validity threats: setup, state, effort, correction.
  • Clear the floor: acuity and contrast at the measured distances.
  • Find the lowest unstable level and stop there.
  • Tie that level to the occupation in the referral question.
1

Referral concern

2nd grader — "reverses letters, skips lines"

2

Screen the floors

Fast Screener: PASS acuity, FLAG saccades + copy accuracy

3

Assess the flagged levels

Mini VPA: Level 2 = 2, Level 4 = 2, Level 5 = 3

4

Interpret

Bottom is unstable → line-losing is an efficiency + integration issue, not a "reversal disorder"

5

Plan

Level 2 & 4 intervention; classroom adapt (line marker, larger spacing); IEP goal at Level 4

6

Re-measure

6-week Mini VPA; retest same skills, document VPL change

Case reasoning flow — the same six moves work whether the concern is copy work, reading fluency, or ADL performance.
Vision in OT Practice
9 / 17

Say this

Frame the slide: "How to read any profile in four steps."

Walk each point, one sentence each:

• Rule out validity threats: setup, state, effort, correction.

My notes

5.10 — Four outcomes, every case

Comparison

Disposition

Four outcomes, every case

OT acts

  • Direct service on the unstable floor
  • Accommodation and environmental change
  • Teacher/caregiver hand-off with one support to keep
  • Scheduled re-probe with the baseline task

OT routes out

  • Eye-care referral for any ocular trigger
  • Adjunct standardized testing for depth in one skill
  • Team referral when language or attention confounds
  • Monitor with a defined re-check date
1

Referral concern

2nd grader — "reverses letters, skips lines"

2

Screen the floors

Fast Screener: PASS acuity, FLAG saccades + copy accuracy

3

Assess the flagged levels

Mini VPA: Level 2 = 2, Level 4 = 2, Level 5 = 3

4

Interpret

Bottom is unstable → line-losing is an efficiency + integration issue, not a "reversal disorder"

5

Plan

Level 2 & 4 intervention; classroom adapt (line marker, larger spacing); IEP goal at Level 4

6

Re-measure

6-week Mini VPA; retest same skills, document VPL change

Case reasoning flow — the same six moves work whether the concern is copy work, reading fluency, or ADL performance.
Vision in OT Practice
10 / 17

Say this

Contrast the two columns: OT acts versus OT routes out.

OT acts:

• Direct service on the unstable floor

My notes

5.11 — Module 5 video — case walkthroughs

Video

Lecture

Module 5 video — case walkthroughs

VIDEO SLOT

Narrated reasoning through the four profile shapes.

Slides tab → set “url” to your YouTube/Vimeo/Loom embed link

Vision in OT Practice
11 / 17

Say this

Set up the clip in one sentence, play it, then debrief with "what did you notice?"

My notes

5.12 — Screenshot — domain profile graph

Visual

Import

Screenshot — domain profile graph

VPA™ · Scored profile
L1Acuity & sensory foundationincl. field & scanning
strong
L2Visual efficiency
limiting
L3Visual processing
emerging
L4Visual-motor integration
limiting
L5Functional integration
breaking down
Profile shape: foundation intact / output limitedIntervention enters at Level 2 (efficiency), not at Level 4 handwriting drill.
Rows are the five framework levels in order (L1 → L5) — the L number is the level, never the score. Performance is the bar and the word beside it. Read the shape before any composite: a flat-but-low profile, a single notch, and a “foundation intact / output collapsed” staircase call for three different plans.
Vision in OT Practice
12 / 17

Say this

Describe what belongs here: Profile chart from a completed VPA™ showing the shape you are discussing..

My notes

5.13 — Work sample — student writing or copy task

Visual

Import

Work sample — student writing or copy task

Line 1 → Line 5: letters grow, spacing widens, baseline drifts upward.
A rendered copy sample showing what performance breakdown looks like on the page: baseline drift, widening spacing, and letter size growth across five lines of sustained near work.
Vision in OT Practice
13 / 17

Say this

Describe what belongs here: De-identified handwriting or copy sample that illustrates the case..

My notes

5.14 — So what? Patterns shorten your reasoning, not your looking

So what?

So what?

So what? Patterns shorten your reasoning, not your looking

Three patterns cover most school referrals — near endurance, page navigation, and visual-motor output. Recognizing the pattern gets you to the right first probe in minutes.

Each pattern has a different latency signature: minutes to fatigue, loss across lines, or breakdown as motor precision rises.

What you do with it

  • Name the pattern out loud before you choose a tool.
  • Match the first probe to the pattern rather than running the whole battery.
  • Re-check the pattern at the 9-week mark; patterns shift as demand changes.

Watch for

A student who fits two patterns — that is usually a Level 1 or Level 2 issue driving both.

Vision in OT Practice
14 / 17

Say this

Land the "so what": Three patterns cover most school referrals — near endurance, page navigation, and visual-motor output. Recognizing the pattern gets you to the right first probe in minutes.

Explain the mechanism plainly: Each pattern has a different latency signature: minutes to fatigue, loss across lines, or breakdown as motor precision rises.

Then give them the moves — say each one as something they can do Monday:

My notes

5.15 — Two-minute case: name the pattern

Mini case

Two-minute case

Two-minute case: name the pattern

A Grade 4 student starts written work strongly, then within six minutes his letter size grows, spacing collapses, and he asks to take a break.

Which pattern is this, and what is your first probe?

Vision in OT Practice
15 / 17

Say this

Two-minute case. Read it aloud:

A Grade 4 student starts written work strongly, then within six minutes his letter size grows, spacing collapses, and he asks to take a break.

Put the question to them: "Which pattern is this, and what is your first probe?" Give 60 seconds, no talking.

My notes

5.16 — Reflect and share

Reflection

Reflect and share

Reflect and share

For the vignette we just worked, what would you have done differently before today, and what will you do now?

THINKPROCESSSHARE
Vision in OT Practice
16 / 17

Say this

Reflection prompt: "For the vignette we just worked, what would you have done differently before today, and what will you do now?"

Offer the sentence starter: "Before today I would have... Now I will..."

Think for one minute, write, then take two shares.

My notes

5.17 — Knowledge check — reasoning

Self-check

Knowledge check

Knowledge check — reasoning

Reading endurance collapses after four minutes but single-word accuracy is intact. What does that pattern point to first?

Vision in OT Practice
17 / 17

Say this

Knowledge check: "Reading endurance collapses after four minutes but single-word accuracy is intact. What does that pattern point to first?"

Options:

• Visual processing (Level 3)

My notes